Opens in a new tab
Parallel Manipulator also name as Parallel Robot or Parallel Mechanism Robot widely used in industrial application
Parallel-robot

How to Design and Build a Parallel Mechanism Robot from Scratch?

parallel-mechanism-robot

Anyone can start a parallel mechanism robot by following this tutorial. The tutorial explains each technical term, so beginners can understand every step. A parallel mechanism robot, sometimes called a parallel manipulator, may seem complex, but this tutorial makes the project simple. The robot uses arduino for control, which helps beginners learn robotics through hands-on experience. Each tutorial step shows how arduino can power the robot, making the project accessible. This tutorial encourages everyone to try building a robot, even if this is their first project. Arduino guides each part of the project, making the tutorial a valuable resource for anyone interested in robotics.

Key Takeaways

  • Parallel mechanism robot uses multiple arms to support and move a platform with high precision and strength.
  • This tutorial explains all technical terms clearly, making it easy for beginners to build their own robot.
  • Arduino controls the parallel robot, allowing hands-on learning and precise operation of all parts.
  • The robot’s design offers flexibility and accuracy, useful for tasks like picking, placing, and precise movements.
  • Anyone interested in robotics can follow this guide to start building a parallel mechanism robot from scratch.

Parallel Mechanism Robot Basics

What Is a Parallel Mechanism Robot?

A parallel mechanism robot, also called a parallel manipulator, uses several independent kinematic chains to connect the base to the end effector. This structure gives the robot high rigidity and precision. Unlike a traditional robot arm, which has joints connected in a single line, a parallel robot supports its moving platform from multiple directions at once. Most designs offer several Degrees of Freedom (DoF), allowing the parallel robot to move and rotate in space. For example, a six DoF parallel mechanism robot can position its gripper anywhere within its workspace and orient it as needed.

Researchers use the Modified Denavit-Hartenberg method to model the kinematics of these robots. This approach considers both active and passive joints. Engineers analyze the parallel robot workspace and singularities using the Jacobian matrix, which helps them avoid positions where the robot might lose control. Dynamic modeling often uses the Euler-Lagrangian method to account for gravity and inertia. Studies show that parallel mechanism robot with kinematic redundancy can increase workspace and avoid singularities. Designers use criteria like the modified Grübler-Kutzbach formula to select the best configuration for a specific task.

  • Parallel robot can have extra joints for more flexibility.
  • Engineers use singularity analysis to keep the robot safe and reliable.
  • Workspace evaluation checks for mechanical interference between parts.
  • Some designs, like the (6+3) DoF hybrid parallel robot, offer large workspaces and high precision.

Key Features and Uses

Parallel mechanism robot stands out for the stiffness, accuracy, and speed. The unique structure makes the robot ideal for tasks that need precise movement and strong support. The table below highlights important performance metrics and real-world applications:

Performance Metric / Usage StatisticDescriptionRole in Parallel Mechanism RobotsPractical Application Examples
Reachable Workspace VolumeMeasures the space the robot can reachShows how far the gripper can moveUseful for large-area pick-and-place tasks
Global Conditioning Index (GCI)Rates dexterity and controlEnsures the gripper moves smoothlyImportant in surgery and security
Design ParametersShape and size choicesHelp balance workspace and dexterityUsed to design custom robots for labs
Limb StructuresTypes of joints and linksAffect stiffness and workspaceChosen for heavy lifting or fine control
Stewart Platform ComparisonBenchmarks against classic designsProves improvements in workspace and dexterityGuides new robot designs
Application FieldsMedicine, education, securityShow where parallel robots excelUsed in surgery, teaching, and surveillance

A parallel mechanism robot often uses a gripper as its end effector. The gripper can pick up, hold, or move objects with high precision. In many cases, the parallel kinematic robot arm works with the gripper to perform complex tasks. These robots appear in medical devices, educational kits, and security systems. Their ability to move a gripper quickly and accurately makes them valuable in many fields.

Planning and Design

Defining Degrees of Freedom

Every parallel manipulator project begins with a clear understanding of degrees of freedom (DoF). Degrees of freedom describe how many independent movements the parallel robot can perform. For example, a 3-DoF parallel robot can move in three different ways, such as up/down, left/right, and forward/backward. Defining DoF shapes the entire design process and determines the complexity of the robot’s movement.

The table below summarizes key factors that influence DoF in parallel mechanism robot:

Key Factor / AspectDescription / EvidenceSupporting Technical or Statistical Evidence
Structural DesignAll revolute joint axes intersect at a single point in spherical parallel mechanisms (SPMs).Kinematic analysis showing rotational DOFs constrained by joint arrangement.
Virtual Middle-Plane ConstraintIntegrates branch constraints into an intermediate virtual constraint plane to reduce DoF.Kinematic equations and velocity Jacobian matrices demonstrating DoF reduction from 3 to 2.
Constraint ForcesApplication of constraint forces on the middle plane to limit one rotational DoF, enabling 2-DoF motion.Workspace analysis and performance metrics (dexterity, force/torque transfer).
Kinematic SolutionsForward and inverse kinematics solutions derived for symmetrical SPMs.Simulation analysis and prototype experiments validating kinematic correctness.
Workspace and Interference ConditionsWorkspace obtained considering inverse kinematics and link interference.Analytical workspace modeling supporting DoF feasibility.
Performance MetricsAnalysis of dexterity and force/torque transfer within operational range.Quantitative performance evaluation supporting DoF functionality.
Statistical Optimization MethodsUse of genetic algorithms for dimension synthesis and singularity elimination in mechanism design.Multi-objective optimization results improving mechanism performance and DoF reliability.
Literature and Prior WorkReferences to established mechanisms (e.g., 3-RRR SPMs) and their matured theoretical and practical applications.Cited studies providing foundational and comparative technical evidence.

Engineers use kinematics to analyze how each part moves and interacts. They apply constraint forces to limit unnecessary movement and ensure the robot performs only the required tasks. Kinematic solutions, both forward and inverse, help predict the position of the end effector based on joint angles or determine joint angles for a desired position. Workspace analysis checks if the robot can reach all necessary points without interference between parts. Performance metrics, such as dexterity and force transfer, guide the design to meet project goals. Statistical optimization methods, like genetic algorithms, help refine the design for reliability and efficiency. Reviewing literature and prior work ensures the project builds on proven concepts.

Choosing Configuration

Selecting the right configuration is a critical step in designing robot projects. The configuration defines how the parts connect and move together. For parallel manipulator, engineers often choose between different motion modes, such as 2R1T (two rotations, one translation) or 3R (three rotations). Displacement manifold theory and screw theory help engineers synthesize mechanisms with multiple 3-DoF motion modes. These theories clarify how the robot’s parts interact and how many driving pairs are necessary for smooth movement.

During configuration selection, engineers analyze degrees of freedom and the rationality of driving pair choices. Some configurations require auxiliary driving pairs to pass through singular positions safely. Kinematic calibration, especially for platforms like the Stewart platform, depends on selecting measurement configurations that cover the full joint space and workspace. Using a dimensionless error model, engineers can improve calibration accuracy by choosing multiple measurement configurations. This approach provides redundant parameter information, which leads to more reliable calibration and better robot performance.

Tip: When designing robot projects, always consider how configuration choices affect controllability and the need for extra driving pairs. This step ensures the parallel robot can handle all required tasks without losing stability or precision.

Simulation and CAD

Simulation and computer-aided design (CAD) play a vital role in every robot project. Engineers use simulation software, such as RoboDK or SolidWorks, to create 3D models of the parallel robot and study its movement. These tools allow for early detection of design issues and help validate the kinematics and torque requirements before building physical parts.

The table below highlights important performance indexes and CAD model statistics that support simulation-based design validation:

Performance Index / CAD Model StatisticDescription / Role in Validation
Automated motion model generationCreates motion models directly from 3D CAD data, ensuring associative updates and accuracy
Kinematic and dynamic motion studiesEnables analysis of mechanism motion and forces for design validation
Fast solverProvides rapid simulation results to evaluate design iterations efficiently
3D animations and plotsVisualizes motion and dynamic responses for intuitive validation
Assembly motion creationSimplifies adding dynamic elements like drivers and springs to CAD assemblies
Complex mechanism dynamicsAssesses intricate interactions within mechanisms to detect issues early
Early-stage issue detectionIdentifies potential design or manufacturing problems before physical prototyping
Design change impact evaluationQuickly assesses effects of modifications on mechanical behavior
Part interferenceDetects physical clashes within assemblies before prototyping, ensuring proper fit and function
Motor sizeAssesses motor requirements based on simulated motion loads, optimizing design
Cam performanceValidates cam profiles and their dynamic behavior within mechanisms
Gear and linkage layoutChecks arrangement and interaction of gears and linkages for correct motion transfer
Assembly constraintsDefines mechanical relationships and limits between parts, essential for accurate motion simulation
ContactsModels interactions and collisions between parts during movement
ForcesApplies loads and torques to simulate real-world operating conditions
ActuatorsSimulates driving elements like motors or springs to drive movement
Motion parametersIncludes velocities, accelerations, and trajectories used to analyze dynamic behavior

Simulation software generates motion models from CAD data, allowing engineers to update designs quickly. Kinematic and dynamic studies reveal how the robot’s parts move and interact under different loads. Fast solvers provide quick feedback, making it easier to test multiple design iterations. 3D animations and plots help visualize the robot’s movement and dynamic responses. Assembly motion creation adds drivers and springs to simulate real-world conditions. Detecting part interference and evaluating motor size in the simulation stage prevents costly mistakes during assembly.

Engineers use simulation to apply forces and torques, check gear and linkage layouts, and define assembly constraints. These steps ensure the parallel robot will function as intended. By modeling contacts and actuators, engineers can predict how the robot will respond to different tasks. Motion parameters, such as velocity and acceleration, help analyze the robot’s dynamic behavior. This process reduces the need for physical prototypes and speeds up the project timeline.

Note: Simulation and CAD tools make it possible to test and refine every aspect of the robot project before building any physical parts. This approach saves time, reduces costs, and increases the chances of project success.

Materials and Components

Mechanical Parts

Every parallel manipulator and scara robot relies on carefully selected mechanical parts. These parts include the frame, arms, joints, and the robot gripper. When building a scara robot, engineers compare quantitative metrics such as safety, quality, schedule, cost, and productivity. They use data from direct measurement of worker performance, project schedules, and manufacturer productivity reports. These comparisons help identify the best robot parts for operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

  • Motion and force transmissibility, workspace analysis, and kinematic accuracy guide the choice of parts.
  • Studies show that 3-DOF parallel manipulator and 5-6 DOF parallel manipulator require different structural synthesis and workspace boundaries.
  • High rigid-weight ratio, load capacity, and stiffness are essential for large-scale scara robots.
  • Applications include machine tools and mobile robots for heavy equipment machining.

Many builders use 3d printing the robot parts to create custom components. This method allows for rapid prototyping and easy modification. The 3d model and stl download files provide templates for printing arms, joints, and the robot gripper. Using 3d printing the robot parts also reduces costs and speeds up the assembly process. The robot gripper, a key component, must match the task requirements for precision and strength.

Tip: Always check the compatibility of all robot parts before assembly. This step ensures smooth movement and prevents mechanical interference.

Electronics and Actuators

The electronics and actuators form the core of any scara robot. These components include arduino boards, sensors, motors, and wiring. Engineers select actuators based on size, power output, precision, reliability, and efficiency. They calculate static and dynamic loads to match motor, screw, and bearing capacities. Oversizing actuators increases costs and causes premature wear. Proper duty cycle estimation prevents overheating and failure.

  1. Specify force and velocity to choose between servo or stepper motors.
  2. Prevent side loading by aligning actuators and bearings.
  3. Observe speed limits to avoid vibration and bearing failure.
  4. Match peak force requirements with actuator capacity.
  5. Consider environmental factors like temperature and contamination.
  6. Ensure the actuator envelope fits the available space.
  7. Select the right drive system for performance and cost.

Arduino controls the robot gripper and other moving parts. The arduino platform enables precise operation of all components. Builders often use arduino to manage sensors and feedback systems, ensuring the scara robot performs tasks accurately. The robot gripper relies on responsive electronics for reliable object handling.

Tools and Software

Building a scara robot requires specialized tools and software. Essential tools include screwdrivers, pliers, wire cutters, and soldering irons for assembling parts and components. Many builders use 3d model and stl download files to guide the fabrication of robot parts. Simulation and CAD software, such as SolidWorks and RoboDK, play a vital role in designing and testing the parallel robot.

  • The industrial robot software market reached $12.6 billion in 2024, offering data collection, analysis, visualization, and simulation tools.
  • These tools optimize processes, reduce downtime, and improve product quality.
  • Real-time analysis and virtual testing enhance safety and efficiency.
  • AI technologies help parallel robots analyze sensor data and adapt to complex environments.
  • Collaborative robots, including scara models, benefit from embedded vision and AI for safe human-robot interaction.

Arduino programming environments allow users to upload code and monitor robot performance. Simulation software enables virtual testing of the parallel manipulator and scara robot before physical assembly. This approach saves time and reduces errors. Builders can experiment with different robot parts and components, refining the design for optimal performance. The robot gripper and other moving parts benefit from realistic simulation, ensuring smooth operation in real-world tasks.

Assembly Steps

Preparing Parts

parallel-mechanism-robots

Every successful robot project begins with careful preparation of all parts. Builders source components such as frames, arms, joints, and the gripper from reliable suppliers or fabricate them using 3D printing or machining. Supply chain visibility tools in platforms like Altium Designer help teams compare component pricing, availability, and minimum order quantities across multiple distributors. This approach allows teams to select parts that meet design requirements while minimizing costs and avoiding delays. Integrating sourcing data early in the project helps prevent cost overruns and ensures that no obsolete parts enter the assembly process.

When preparing parts for a scara or parallel manipulator, teams often:

  1. Identify the highest cost-driving parts in the assembly to focus on cost-saving opportunities.
  2. Analyze material weight versus cost, since manufacturing time and processes can affect overall expenses.
  3. Review manufacturing time data, such as cycle times, to spot discrepancies in supplier quotes.
  4. Use reports on capacity consumption and near net shape utilization to find parts suitable for casting, which reduces waste.
  5. Break down costs by material, labor, overhead, tooling, and cycle times for precise tracking.
  6. Monitor cost and weight changes over time to support continuous improvement.
  7. Integrate CAD models to refine cost estimates and optimize material choices.
  8. Add assembly process costs, such as welding or mechanical assembly, to achieve a fully costed project.

Tip: Early and detailed cost analysis helps teams avoid surprises during assembly and ensures that all parts are ready when needed.

Builders must inspect each part for defects or inconsistencies. They check that the gripper, arms, and joints match the 3D model and fit together without gaps. Proper labeling and organization of parts streamline the assembly process and reduce the risk of errors.

Assembling the Robot

Assembling the parallel robot requires precision and patience. Builders start by laying out all parts in the order of assembly. They follow the project’s CAD drawings and instructions to ensure correct placement of each component. For a scara or parallel manipulator, precise alignment of arms, joints, and the gripper is essential for smooth movement and accurate operation.

The table below shows how precision measurements and alignment techniques improve assembly quality:

Measurement AspectProposed MethodComparative Method (Liu et al.)
Position Alignment Error (μm)Δx = -9.6, Δy = -7.5, Δz = -13.7Initial: Δx = -760.5, Δy = -1433.8, Δz = -6367.5
Orientation Alignment Error (°)Δθx = -0.02, Δθy = -0.02Initial: Δθx = -0.56, Δθy = -0.38
Standard Deviation Position (μm)xs = 10.36, ys = 9.36, zs = 14.07xs = 12.78, ys = 10.67, zs = 13.85
Standard Deviation Orientation (°)θxs = 0.03, θys = 0.02θxs = 0.04, θys = 0.03
Alignment Steps9 steps to stable error reductionN/A
Time EfficiencyFaster than Liu et al. methodSlower than proposed method

This data shows that careful alignment reduces errors to just a few micrometers and improves efficiency. Builders use jigs, calipers, and alignment tools to achieve these results. They tighten fasteners in a specific sequence to maintain stiffness and prevent distortion. Each joint must move freely without excessive play or friction.

The precision of the assembly depends on several factors. Manufacturing tolerances, backlash in mechanical parts, and temperature changes can all affect alignment. Backlash, for example, causes position errors when the direction of movement reverses. Builders can compensate for backlash by calibrating the robot or improving the design. Temperature drift can cause small deviations over time, so builders may need to model thermal expansion for critical parts. For complex robots like the Stewart–Gough platform, calibration can involve over 130 parameters, making precise assembly even more important.

Note: Maintaining precise alignment and stiffness during assembly ensures that the gripper and arms move smoothly and accurately throughout the parallel robot workspace.

Wiring and Electronics

Wiring and electronics bring the robot to life. Builders install the arduino board, connect sensors, and wire up the motors that drive the arms and gripper. Each connection must follow the project’s wiring diagram to avoid mistakes. Proper routing of wires prevents tangling and reduces the risk of electrical interference.

The arduino platform controls the movement of the scara robot and parallel manipulator. Builders upload code to the arduino to manage the gripper, coordinate joint movement, and process sensor feedback. They test each connection with a multimeter before powering up the system. Secure mounting of the arduino and other electronics protects them from vibration and accidental damage during operation.

Always double-check wiring before applying power. Incorrect connections can damage the arduino, motors, or sensors.

Builders use cable ties and wire sleeves to organize wiring and keep the assembly neat. They label each wire to simplify troubleshooting and future upgrades. The gripper’s wiring must allow for full range of movement without pulling or snagging. After wiring, builders perform initial tests to verify that the arduino can control all parts of the parallel robot as intended.

A well-organized wiring setup supports reliable operation and makes future maintenance easier. The arduino’s flexibility allows builders to adjust the project’s behavior as needed, whether for a scara robot or a more complex parallel manipulator.

Programming and Testing

Control System Setup

Programming the scara robot begins with setting up the control system. Engineers use arduino to manage all movements and responses. The arduino based scara robot relies on precise control signals to move each joint and the robot gripper. Control system performance is measured using several key metrics:

Performance MetricDescription
Rise TimeTime for output to reach a certain percentage of the reference value
Settling TimeTime for output to remain within a specified range of the reference value
OvershootAmount by which output exceeds the reference value
Steady-State ErrorDifference between output and reference at steady state
BandwidthFrequency range where the system operates effectively
Gain MarginMaximum input gain increase before instability
Phase MarginMaximum input phase delay before instability

These metrics help engineers evaluate and compare different control strategies for the arduino based scara robot. Open-source frameworks allow systematic testing and benchmarking, supporting repeatable experiments in real-world scenarios like pick-and-place or patrol tasks.

Kinematics and Algorithms

Programming the scara robot requires a deep understanding of kinematics. Engineers implement both forward and inverse kinematics to calculate the position and orientation of the robot gripper. The parallel manipulator structure increases the complexity of these calculations. Several algorithms support efficient kinematics computation:

AlgorithmMean Solution Time (ms)Iteration Count (avg)Success Rate (%)
TensorFlow (simple IK objective)8.0636.99100
JAX (simple IK objective)12.6237.27100
IPOPT (simple IK objective)164.7313.24N/A
CCD (simple IK objective)25.44N/A91.19
FABRIK (simple IK objective)85.28N/AN/A

The FoldRail mechanism demonstrates that forward and inverse kinematics can have multiple solutions. Engineers use elimination-based algorithms to simplify calculations and optimize the programming process. Simulation tools like Julia help validate these algorithms before deploying them to the arduino.

Testing and Calibration

Testing and calibration ensure the scara robot operates with high accuracy. Engineers use iterative procedures to refine the control and kinematics models. The AMLM-BIPSO calibration method improves accuracy by up to 86%, reducing errors and standard deviation significantly. The process involves:

  1. Collecting data from over 1,000 points across the parallel robot workspace.
  2. Identifying and adjusting parameters to match real-world behavior.
  3. Verifying results through repeated testing and comparison with specifications.
  4. Refining calibration until the robot meets all performance goals.

Robot calibration adjusts parameters so the arduino based scara robot matches its programmed model. This step is essential for reliable operation and precise control.

Best practices include thorough data collection, clear calibration goals, and systematic verification. Engineers repeat testing and calibration as needed to maintain optimal performance for the parallel manipulator and scara robot.

Improvements and Next Steps

Troubleshooting

Troubleshooting forms a vital part of every robotics project. Builders often encounter issues such as motor output failures, sensor misconfigurations, or software exceptions. A parallel manipulator or scara robot may stop moving, follow an incorrect trajectory, or display errors like MalformedSplineException. To address these, builders should:

  • Check all hardware connections, especially between the arduino and the gripper.
  • Verify sensor data accuracy and ensure the arduino receives correct feedback.
  • Review software configuration for the project and confirm all code matches the robot’s design.
  • Use diagnostic questions to isolate whether the problem lies with the arduino, the gripper, or another component.

Robots experience system failure about 12% of the year, but proper maintenance can reduce this rate. Predictive maintenance, supported by Industrial IoT, can increase equipment uptime by up to 9%. Tools like remote diagnostics help builders monitor the arduino and gripper in real time. Systematic troubleshooting, such as the 5 Whys Technique, helps identify root causes instead of just symptoms. Builders should distinguish between temporary fixes and permanent solutions to keep the project reliable.

Upgrades and Customization

After completing the initial project, builders often seek ways to upgrade or customize their parallel manipulator. Adding new features, such as a more advanced gripper or additional sensors, can expand the robot’s capabilities. The arduino platform supports many upgrades, including wireless modules or improved motor drivers. Builders may redesign the gripper for better precision or strength, depending on the project’s needs.

A table can help organize possible upgrades:

Upgrade OptionBenefitIntegration Tip
High-torque motorsIncreases payload for gripperUpdate arduino code for control
Force sensorsImproves gripper feedbackCalibrate with arduino
Wireless connectivityEnables remote project controlUse arduino-compatible modules
Modular gripper designAdapts to new project tasksTest with simulation first

Customization allows each project to meet specific goals. Builders can experiment with different gripper shapes or arduino routines to optimize performance. The parallel manipulator structure supports many creative modifications.

Learning Resources

Learning never stops in robotics. Builders who use additional resources often see better results in their project. Studies show that professional development in robotics leads to significant improvements in teaching and learning outcomes. When teachers use robotics resources, 81% of observed teaching indicators improve. Students working with robots, such as a parallel manipulator or scara robot, often achieve higher learning gains.

Meta-analyses reveal that robot tutors produce medium effect sizes for both cognitive and emotional learning. These results match those of human tutors, showing that extra resources, like tutorials or online courses, can boost project success. Builders should explore guides, forums, and video tutorials focused on arduino, gripper design, and parallel manipulator assembly. Many open-source communities share project files and troubleshooting tips, making it easier to solve problems and upgrade the parallel robot.

Tip: Regularly reviewing new learning materials helps builders stay updated and improve every project, from the arduino code to the gripper mechanism.

parallel-mechanism-robot-design

Conclusion

A successful project of parallel manipulator starts with clear planning and careful assembly. Each project benefits from early user involvement and structured usability evaluations, such as UEQ and QUEST, which help refine the project through feedback.

  • Every project should include iterative testing to address fatigue and ergonomic issues, as shown by increased lap times in robot-assisted trials.
  • Standardized usability measures improve project outcomes and guide future improvements.
  • Sharing project results and reflecting on lessons learned encourages others to begin their own project journey.
  • Persistence and curiosity drive every project forward, leading to better designs and greater satisfaction.
FindingDescriptionImplication for Project
Early user involvementShapes project concepts and prototypesImproves project usability
Iterative testingReveals ergonomic shortcomingsGuides project enhancements
Standardized evaluationEnsures reliable project dataSupports project comparability

Every project offers a chance to experiment, iterate, and inspire others in the robotics community.

FAQ

What Makes a Scara Robot Different from Other Robots?

A scara robot uses a unique arm structure that moves in a horizontal plane. This design allows fast and precise pick-and-place tasks. Many factories use scara robots for assembly lines. The parallel manipulator structure gives extra stability and accuracy compared to traditional robot arms.

How Does Arduino Control a Scara Robot?

Arduino sends signals to motors and sensors in the scara robot. It reads sensor data and adjusts movement in real time. Builders use arduino code to program the robot’s actions. Arduino also helps calibrate the parallel manipulator for better accuracy and repeatability.

Can Beginners Build a Scara Robot with Arduino?

Yes, beginners can build a scara robot using arduino. Many online guides explain each step. Arduino simplifies wiring and programming. Builders can test the parallel manipulator with simple arduino sketches. Scara robots offer a great introduction to robotics for students and hobbyists.

What Are Common Problems When Building a Scara Robot?

Builders sometimes face wiring mistakes or motor alignment issues. Arduino may not detect sensors if connections are loose. The parallel manipulator can lose accuracy if parts are not assembled tightly. Testing each arduino function helps find and fix problems early in the project.

How Can Someone Upgrade a Scara Robot Project?

Upgrades include adding better sensors, stronger motors, or a new gripper. Arduino supports many modules for wireless control or advanced feedback. Builders can redesign the parallel manipulator for more speed or precision. Scara robots adapt well to new features and project goals.

If you are interested in our parallel manipulator or parallel robot, please fill out below form or send email to info@parallelmanipulator.com

    * Name:

    * Email:

    * Phone:

    * WhatsApp:

    * Subject:

    * Message:

    We use cookies in order to give you the best possible experience on our website. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies.
    Accept